Paper detail

What can we learn from functional clustering of mortality data? An application to HMD data

In most cases, mortality is analysed considering summary indicators (e.~g. $e_0$ or $e^{\dagger}_0$) that either focus on a specific mortality component or pool all component-specific information in one measure. This can be a limitation, when we are interested to analyse the global evolution of mortality patterns without loosing sight of specific components evolution. The paper analyses whether there are different patterns of mortality decline among developed countries, identifying the role played by all the mortality components. We implement a cluster analysis using a Functional Data Analysis (FDA) approach, which allows us to consider age-specific mortality rather than summary measures as it analyses curves rather than scalar data. Combined with a Functional Principal Component Analysis (PCA) method it can identify what part of the curves (mortality components) is responsible for assigning one country to a specific cluster. FDA clustering is applied to 32 countries of Human Mortality Database and years 1960--2010. The results show that the evolutions of developed countries follow the same pattern (with different timing): (1) a reduction of infant mortality, (2) an increase of premature mortality, (3) a shift and compression of deaths. Some countries are following this scheme and recovering the gap with precursors, others do not show signs of recovery. Eastern Europe countries are still at stage (2) and it is not clear if and when they will enter into phase (3). All the country differences relates the different timing with which countries undergo the stages identified by clusters. The cluster analysis based on FDA allows therefore a comprehensive understanding of the patterns of mortality decline for considered countries.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.