Paper detail

What can we learn from FRB 200428?

The two radio pulses (TRPs) from SGR 1935+2154 detected by \cite{BKRMHB} and \cite{2020arXiv200510324T} have similar features to that of cosmological fast radio bursts (FRBs). Many authors directly call the TRPs as FRB 200428 without consider two questions carefully. (1) Are the TRPs just two brighter subpulses of a normal radio pulse liking the normal radio pulses seen in other magnetars during their outburst? (2) If the TRPs are two bursts of an FRB, does this make other FRBs difficult to understand? In this paper, we try to clarify these two questions. First, we compare these TRPs with previous observations of normal radio pulses from pulsars and magnetars, and find that the TRPs should be produced by different mechanism from that of normal radio pulses. We then investigate the second question by assuming the TRPs have the same origin as that of periodically repeating FRBs and find that the origin of the periodicity of periodically repeating FRBs should not be induced by precession. Otherwise, we should expect that the TRPs are not an FRB, at least the TRPs don't have the same origin as that of periodically repeating FRBs.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.