Paper detail

What can the anthropic principle tell us about the future of the dark energy universe?

An anthropic explanation for evident smallness of the value of the dark energy implies the existence of a time-dependent component of the scalar field, serving, together with a negative-valued cosmological constant, as one of two components to the overall density of the dark energy. The observers (i.e. us) might then only evolve in those regions of the universe where the sum of those two components (a positive and a negative ones) is sufficiently close to zero. However, according to Vilenkin and Garriga, the scalar field component has to slowly but surely diminish in time. In about a trillion years this process will put a cap to the now-observable accelerated expansion of the universe, leading to a subsequent phase of impending collapse. However, the vanishing scalar field might also produce some rather unexpected singularities for a finite non-zero scale factor. We analyse this possibility on a particular example of Sudden Future Singularities (SFS) and come to a startling conclusion: the time required for SFS to arise must be "comparable" to the lifetime of observable universe.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.