Paper detail

What can Cosmology tell us about Gravity? Constraining Horndeski with Sigma and Mu

Phenomenological functions $Σ$ and $μ$ (also known as $G_{\rm light}/G$ and $G_{\rm matter}/G$) are commonly used to parameterize possible modifications of the Poisson equation relating the matter density contrast to the lensing and the Newtonian potentials, respectively. They will be well constrained by future surveys of large scale structure. But what would the implications of measuring particular values of these functions be for modified gravity theories? We ask this question in the context of general Horndeski class of single field scalar-tensor theories with second order equations of motion. We find several consistency conditions that make it possible to rule out broad classes of theories based on measurements of $Σ$ and $μ$ that are independent of their parametric forms. For instance, a measurement of $Σ\ne 1$ would rule out all models with a canonical form of kinetic energy, while finding $Σ-1$ and $μ-1$ to be of opposite sign would strongly disfavour the entire class of Horndeski models. We separately examine the large and the small scale limits, the possibility of scale-dependence, and the consistency with bounds on the speed of gravitational waves. We identify sub-classes of Horndeski theories that can be ruled out based on the measured difference between $Σ$ and $μ$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.