What can CMB observations tell us about the neutrino distribution function?

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Abstract

Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) observations have been used extensively to constrain key properties of neutrinos, such as their mass. However, these inferences are typically dependent on assumptions about the cosmological model, and in particular upon the distribution function of neutrinos in the early Universe. In this paper, we aim to assess the full extent to which CMB experiments are sensitive to the shape of the neutrino distribution. We demonstrate that Planck and CMB-S4-like experiments have no prospects for detecting particular features in the distribution function. Consequently, we take a general approach and marginalise completely over the form of the neutrino distribution to derive constraints on the relativistic and non-relativistic neutrino energy densities, characterised by Neff=3.0±0.4N_\mathrm{eff} = 3.0 \pm 0.4 and ρν,0NR<14 eV cm−3ρ_{ν,0}^{\rm NR} < 14 \, \mathrm{eV}\,\mathrm{cm}^{-3} at 95% CL, respectively. The fact that these are the only neutrino properties that CMB data can constrain has important implications for neutrino mass limits from cosmology. Specifically, in contrast to the ΛΛCDM case where CMB and BAO data tightly constrain the sum of neutrinos masses to be ∑mν<0.12 eV\sum m_ν< 0.12 \, \mathrm{eV}, we explicitly show that neutrino masses as large as ∑mν∼3 eV\sum m_ν\sim 3 \, \mathrm{eV} are perfectly consistent with this data. Importantly, for this to be the case, the neutrino number density should be suitably small such that the bound on ρν,0NR=∑mνnν,0ρ_{ν,0}^\mathrm{NR} = \sum m_νn_{ν,0} is still satisfied. We conclude by giving an outlook on the opportunities that may arise from other complementary experimental probes, such as galaxy surveys, neutrino mass experiments and facilities designed to directly detect the cosmic neutrino background.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.