Paper detail

What are the spectroscopic binaries with high mass functions near the Gaia DR3 main sequence?

The 3rd data release of the Gaia mission includes orbital solutions for $> 10^5$ single-lined spectroscopic binaries, representing more than an order of magnitude increase in sample size over all previous studies. This dataset is a treasure trove for searches for quiescent black hole + normal star binaries. We investigate one population of black hole candidate binaries highlighted in the data release: sources near the main sequence in the color-magnitude diagram (CMD) with dynamically-inferred companion masses $M_2$ larger than the CMD-inferred mass of the luminous star. We model light curves, spectral energy distributions, and archival spectra of the 14 such objects in DR3 with high-significance orbital solutions and inferred $M_2 > 3\,M_{\odot}$. We find that 100\% of these sources are mass-transfer binaries containing a highly stripped lower giant donor ($0.2 \lesssim M/M_{\odot} \lesssim 0.4$) and much more massive ($2 \lesssim M/M_{\odot} \lesssim 2.5$) main-sequence accretor. The Gaia orbital solutions are for the donors, which contribute about half the light in the Gaia RVS bandpass but only $\lesssim 20\%$ in the $g-$band. The accretors' broad spectral features likely prevented the sources from being classified as double-lined. The donors are all close to Roche lobe-filling ($R/R_{\rm Roche\,lobe}>0.8$), but modeling suggests that a majority are detached ($R/R_{\rm Roche\,lobe}<1$). Binary evolution models predict that these systems will soon become detached helium white dwarf + main sequence "EL CVn" binaries. Our investigation highlights both the power of Gaia data for selecting interesting sub-populations of binaries and the ways in which binary evolution can bamboozle standard CMD-based stellar mass estimates.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.