Paper detail

WFI J161953.3+031909: eclipsing ER UMa-type and Z Cam-type star in the period gap

WFI J161953.3+031909 was considered to be an eclipsing novalike object in the period gap. Using the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF) public database, I found that this object is the first eclipsing Z Cam star in the period gap, and is also most likely an ER UMa star with supercycles of 60-80 d. The longest outburst (most likely a superoutburst) comprised 35-46% of the supercycle in the extreme case. If superhumps are confirmed, this becomes the second object showing both ER UMa and Z Cam states after NY Ser. These objects have anomalously high mass-transfer rates despite that they are in the period gap. I refined the orbital period to be 0.099419808(8) d. We can expect to learn from WFI J161953.3+031909 using eclipses what is actually happening in the ER UMa-type and Z Cam-type disk. I also provide a revised classification of an eclipsing IW And star for BMAM-V383 = IPHAS J200822.55+300341.6 by detecting an IW And-type standstill.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.