Paper detail

Weyl, Pontryagin, Euler, Eguchi and Freund

In a September 1976 PRL Eguchi and Freund considered two topological invariants: the Pontryagin number $P \sim \int d^4x \sqrt{g}R^* R$ and the Euler number $χ\sim \int d^4x \sqrt{g}R^* R^*$ and posed the question: to what anomalies do they contribute? They found that $P$ appears in the integrated divergence of the axial fermion number current, thus providing a novel topological interpretation of the anomaly found by Kimura in 1969 and Delbourgo and Salam in 1972. However, they found no analogous role for $χ$. This provoked my interest and, drawing on my April 1976 paper with Deser and Isham on gravitational Weyl anomalies, I was able to show that for Conformal Field Theories the trace of the stress tensor depends on just two constants: \[ g^{μν}\langle T_{μν}\rangle=\frac{1}{(4π)^2}(cF-aG)\] where $F$ is the square of the Weyl tensor and $\int d^4x\sqrt{g} G/(4π)^2$ is the Euler number. For free CFTs with $N_s$massless fields of spin $s$ \[ 720c=6N_0 + 18N_{1/2} + 72 N_1~~~~ 720a=2N_0 + 11N_{1/2} + 124N_1 \]

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.