Paper detail

Wetting regimes and interactions of parallel plane surfaces in a polar liquid

We apply a phenomenological theory of polar liquids to calculate the interaction energy between two plane surfaces at nm-distances. We show that depending on the properties of the surface-liquid interfaces, the interacting surfaces induce polarization of the liquid in different ways. We find, in full agreement with available experiments, that if the interfaces are mostly hydrophobic, then the interaction is attractive and relatively long-ranged (interaction decay length λ\sim1.2\, nm). The water molecules are net polarized parallel to the surfaces in this case. If the surfaces are mostly hydrophilic, then the molecules are polarized against the surfaces, and the interaction becomes repulsive, but at a short-range (λ\sim0.2\, nm). Finally, we predict there exists an intermediate regime, where the surfaces fail to order the water molecules, the interaction becomes much weaker, attractive and, at relatively small distances, decays with the inverse square of the distance between the surfaces.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.