Paper detail

Wetting in a two-dimensional capped capillary. Part II: Three-phase coexistence

In Part II of this study we consider two cases of three-phase coexistence. First, the capped capillary may allow for vapour, drop-like, and slab-like phases to coexist at the same values of temperature and chemical potential. Second, the slit pore forming the bulk of the capped capillary may allow for the coexistence between vapour, planar prewetting film and capillary-liquid. While the consideration of the former case allows us to summarise the phenomenology presented in Part I and to show that the transition line of wedge prewetting is shifted in capillary-like geometries by a constant value, depending on the capillary width, the careful examination of the latter case allows us to uncover a new phase transition in confined fluids, a continuous planar prewetting transition. A planar prewetting transition is known to be a distinctly first-order phenomenon, and typically taking place on the scale of several atomic diameters. A continuous prewetting transition, on the other hand, is scale invariant. Thus, apart from being of fundamental significance, this finding has potential for facilitating experimental detection as well as measurements of planar prewetting. Further, we provide proof for the existence of a tri-critical point of the three-phase coexistence line of the capped capillary while by considering a dynamic model of wetting we show how the relaxation of the system can be pinned by a metastable state. We present a full parametric study of our model system and support our findings with exhaustive examples of density profiles, adsorption and free energy isotherms, and full phase diagrams.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.