Paper detail

Wettability and surface energy of parylene F

Parylenes are barrier materials employed as protective layers. However, many parylenes are unsuitable for applications under harsh conditions. A new material, parylene F, demonstrates considerable potential for a wide range of applications due to its high temperature and UV resistance. For the first time, the wettability and surface energy of parylene F were investigated to determine the feasibility of parylene F as an alternative to the commonly employed parylene C. The results show that parylene F has a hydrophobic surface with a water contact angle of 109.63 degrees. We found that 3.5 ul probe liquid is an optimal value for the contact angle measurement of parylene F. Moreover, we found that the Owens-Wendt-Kaelble and the Lifshitz-van der Waals/acid-base approaches are unsuitable for determining the surface energy of parylene F, whereas an approach based on the limitless liquid-solid interface wetting system is compatible. Furthermore, the results show that parylene F has a surface energy of 39.05 mJ/m2. Considering the improved resistance, relatively low cost, and the desirable properties, parylene F can replace parylene C for applications under harsh conditions.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.