Paper detail

Were the Obliquities in DI Herculis Excited by an Unseen Tertiary Companion?

The eclipsing binary DI Herculis garnered interest for several decades because of an apparent disagreement between the observed and calculated values of the apsidal precession rate. The problem was resolved when both stars were found to have high obliquities, but the reason for the high obliquities is unknown. Here we investigate the possibility that the obliquities are (or were) excited by an unseen tertiary star. Obliquity excitation in the current orbital configuration can be ruled out with existing data; any tertiary star that is sufficiently close or massive to overcome the strong spin-orbit coupling of the binary would have been detected through various dynamical effects. It remains possible that the orbit of DI Herculis was initially wider and the obliquity was excited during high-eccentricity tidal migration driven by a tertiary companion, but in this scenario it would be difficult to explain why the observed spin rates are much faster than the pseudo-synchronous rate. In addition, inward migration is most likely to arise when the mass of the perturbing star is comparable to the binary mass, and such a bright tertiary would have been detected in imaging or spectroscopic data. Alternative explanations that do not invoke a tertiary star should be sought for the large obliquities in DI Herculis.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.