Paper detail

Well-Sampled Far-Infrared Spectral Energy Distributions of z ~ 2 Galaxies: Evidence for Scaled up Cool Galaxies

We present an analysis of the far-infrared (FIR) spectral energy distributions (SEDs) of two massive K-selected galaxies at z = 2.122 and z = 2.024 detected at 24um, 70um, 160um by Spitzer, 250um, 350um, 500um by BLAST, and 870um by APEX. The large wavelength range of these observations and the availability of spectroscopic redshifts allow us to unambiguously identify the peak of the redshifted thermal emission from dust at ~ 300um. The SEDs of both galaxies are reasonably well fit by synthetic templates of local galaxies with L_IR ~ 10^{11} L_{sun} -- 10^{12} L_{sun} yet both galaxies have L_{IR} ~ 10^{13} L_{sun}. This suggests that these galaxies are not high redshift analogues of the Hyper-LIRGs/ULIRGs used in local templates, but are instead "scaled up" versions of local ULIRGs/LIRGs. For both galaxies the star formation rate determined from the best-fit FIR SEDs (SFR(L_{IR})) agrees with the SFR determined from the dust corrected H-alpha luminosity (SFR(H-alpha)) to within a factor of ~ 2; however, when the SFR of these galaxies is estimated using only the observed 24um flux and the standard luminosity-dependent template method (SFR(24um)), it systematically overestimates the SFR by as much as a factor of 6. A larger sample of 24 K-selected galaxies at z ~ 2.3 drawn from the Kriek et al. (2008) GNIRS sample shows the same trend between SFR(24um) and SFR(H-alpha). Using that sample we show that SFR(24um) and SFR(H-alpha) are in better agreement when SFR(24um) is estimated using the log average of local templates rather than selecting a single luminosity-dependent template, because this incorporates lower luminosity templates. The better agreement between SFRs from lower luminosity templates suggests that the FIR SEDs of the BLAST-detected galaxies may be typical for massive galaxies at z ~ 2, and that the majority are scaled up versions of lower luminosity local galaxies.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.