Paper detail

Weighted random generation of context-free languages: Analysis of collisions in random urn occupancy models

The present work analyzes the redundancy of sets of combinatorial objects produced by a weighted random generation algorithm proposed by Denise et al. This scheme associates weights to the terminals symbols of a weighted context-free grammar, extends this weight definition multiplicatively on words, and draws words of length $n$ with probability proportional their weight. We investigate the level of redundancy within a sample of $k$ word, the proportion of the total probability covered by $k$ words (coverage), the time (number of generations) of the first collision, and the time of the full collection. For these four questions, we use an analytic urn analogy to derive asymptotic estimates and/or polynomially computable exact forms. We illustrate these tools by an analysis of an RNA secondary structure statistical sampling algorithm introduced by Ding et al.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.