Paper detail

Weighted Packet Selection for Rechargeable Links: Complexity and Approximation

We consider a natural problem dealing with weighted packet selection across a rechargeable link, which e.g., finds applications in cryptocurrency networks. The capacity of a link $(u,v)$ is determined by how much players $u$ and $v$ allocate for this link. Specifically, the input is a finite ordered sequence of packets that arrive in both directions along a link. Given $(u, v)$ and a packet of weight $x$ going from $u$ to $v$, player $u$ can either accept or reject the packet. If player $u$ accepts the packet, their capacity on link $(u,v)$ decreases by $x$. Correspondingly, player $v$ capacity on $(u,v)$ increases by $x$. If a player rejects the packet, this will entail a cost linear in the weight of the packet. A link is "rechargeable" in the sense that the total capacity of the link has to remain constant, but the allocation of capacity at the ends of the link can depend arbitrarily on players' decisions. The goal is to minimise the sum of the capacity injected into the link and the cost of rejecting packets. We show the problem is NP-hard, but can be approximated efficiently with a ratio of $(1+ \varepsilon)\cdot (1+\sqrt{3})$ for some arbitrary $\varepsilon >0$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.