Paper detail

Weighted estimates for dyadic paraproducts and t-Haar multipiers with complexity (m,n)

We extend the definitions of dyadic paraproduct and t-Haar multipliers to dyadic operators that depend on the complexity (m,n), for m and n positive integers. We will use the ideas developed by Nazarov and Volberg to prove that the weighted L^2(w)-norm of a paraproduct with complexity (m,n) associated to a function b\in BMO, depends linearly on the A_2-characteristic of the weight w, linearly on the BMO-norm of b, and polynomially in the complexity. This argument provides a new proof of the linear bound for the dyadic paraproduct (the one with complexity (0,0)). Also we prove that the L^2-norm of a t-Haar multiplier for any t and weight w depends on the square root of the C_{2t}-characteristic of w times the square root of the A_2-characteristic of w^{2t} and polynomially in the complexity (m,n), recovering a result of Beznosova for the (0,0)-complexity case.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.