Paper detail

Weight-finite modules over the quantum affine and double quantum affine algebras of type $\mathfrak a_1$

We define the categories of weight-finite modules over the type $\mathfrak a_1$ quantum affine algebra $\dot{\mathrm{U}}_q(\mathfrak a_1)$ and over the type $\mathfrak a_1$ double quantum affine algebra $\ddot{\mathrm{U}}_q(\mathfrak a_1)$ that we introduced in a previous paper. In both cases, we classify the simple objects in those categories. In the quantum affine case, we prove that they coincide with the simple finite-dimensional $\dot{\mathrm{U}}_q(\mathfrak a_1)$-modules which were classified by Chari and Pressley in terms of their highest (rational and $\ell$-dominant) $\ell$-weights or, equivalently, by their Drinfel'd polynomials. In the double quantum affine case, we show that simple weight-finite modules are classified by their ($t$-dominant) highest $t$-weight spaces, a family of simple modules over the subalgebra $\ddot{\mathrm{U}}_q^0(\mathfrak a_1)$ of $\ddot{\mathrm{U}}_q(\mathfrak a_1)$ which is conjecturally isomorphic to a split extension of the elliptic Hall algebra. The proof of the classification, in the double quantum affine case, relies on the construction of a double quantum affine analogue of the evaluation modules that appear in the quantum affine setting.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.