Paper detail

Weighing Neutrinos in $f(R)$ gravity

We constrain the neutrino properties in $f(R)$ gravity using the latest observations from cosmic microwave background(CMB) and baryon acoustic oscillation(BAO) measurements. We first constrain separately the total mass of neutrinos $\sum m_ν$ and the effective number of neutrino species $N_{\rm eff}$. Then we constrain $N_{\rm eff}$ and $\sum m_ν$ simultaneously. We find $\sum m_ν<0.462 {\rm eV}$ at a $95\%$ confidence level for the combination of Planck CMB data, WMAP CMB polarization data, BAO data and high-$l$ data from the Atacama Cosmology Telescope and the South Pole Telescope. We also find $N_{\rm eff}=3.32^{+0.54}_{-0.51}$ at a $95\%$ confidence level for the same data set. When constraining $N_{\rm eff}$ and $\sum m_ν$ simultaneously, we find $N_{\rm eff}=3.58^{+0.72}_{-0.69}$ and $\sum m_ν<0.860{\rm eV}$ at a $95\%$ confidence level, respectively.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.