Paper detail

Weighed scalar averaging in LTB dust models, part I: statistical fluctuations and gravitational entropy

We introduce a weighed scalar average formalism ("q-average") for the study of the theoretical properties and the dynamics of spherically symmetric Lemaitre-Tolman-Bondi (LTB) dust models models. The "q-scalars" that emerge by applying the q-averages to the density, Hubble expansion and spatial curvature (which are common to FLRW models) are directly expressible in terms of curvature and kinematic invariants and identically satisfy FLRW evolution laws without the back-reaction terms that characterize Buchert's average. The local and non-local fluctuations and perturbations with respect to the q-average convey the effects of inhomogeneity through the ratio of curvature and kinematic invariants and the magnitude of radial gradients. All curvature and kinematic proper tensors that characterize the models are expressible as irreducible algebraic expansions on the metric and 4-velocity, whose coefficients are the q-scalars and their linear and quadratic local fluctuations. All invariant contractions of these tensors are quadratic fluctuations, whose q-averages are directly and exactly related to statistical correlation moments of the density and Hubble expansion scalar. We explore the application of this formalism to a definition of a gravitational entropy functional proposed by Hosoya et al (2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 141302). We show that a positive entropy production follows from a negative correlation between fluctuations of the density and Hubble scalar, providing a brief outline on its fulfillment in various LTB models and regions. While the q-average formalism is specially suited for LTB and Szekeres models, it may provide a valuable theoretical insight on the properties of scalar averaging in inhomogeneous spacetimes in general.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.