Paper detail

Weaker yet again: mass spectrum-consistent cosmological constraints on the neutrino lifetime

We consider invisible neutrino decay $ν_H \to ν_l + ϕ$ in the ultra-relativistic limit and compute the neutrino anisotropy loss rate relevant for the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies. Improving on our previous work which assumed massless $ν_l$ and $ϕ$, we reinstate in this work the daughter neutrino mass $m_{νl}$ in a manner consistent with the experimentally determined neutrino mass splittings. We find that a nonzero $m_{νl}$ introduces a new phase space factor in the loss rate $Γ_{\rm T}$ proportional to $(Δm_ν^2/m_{ν_H}^2)^2$ in the limit of a small squared mass gap between the parent and daughter neutrinos, i.e., $Γ_{\rm T} \sim (Δm_ν^2/m_{νH}^2)^2 (m_{νH}/E_ν)^5 (1/τ_0)$, where $τ_0$ is the $ν_H$ rest-frame lifetime. Using a general form of this result, we update the limit on $τ_0$ using the Planck 2018 CMB data. We find that for a parent neutrino of mass $m_{νH} \lesssim 0.1 {\rm eV}$, the new phase space factor weakens the constraint on its lifetime by up to a factor of 50 if $Δm_ν^2$ corresponds to the atmospheric mass gap and up to $10^{5}$ if the solar mass gap, in comparison with naive estimates that assume $m_{νl}=0$. The revised constraints are (i) $τ^0 \gtrsim (6 \to 10) \times 10^5~{\rm s}$ and $τ^0 \gtrsim (400 \to 500)~{\rm s}$ if only one neutrino decays to a daughter neutrino separated by, respectively, the atmospheric and the solar mass gap, and (ii) $τ^0 \gtrsim (2 \to 3) \times 10^7~{\rm s}$ in the case of two decay channels with one near-common atmospheric mass gap. In contrast to previous, naive limits which scale as $m_{νH}^5$, these mass spectrum-consistent $τ_0$ constraints are remarkably independent of the parent mass and open up a swath of parameter space within the projected reach of IceCube and other neutrino telescopes in the next two decades.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.