Paper detail

Weak Visibility Queries of Line Segments in Simple Polygons and Polygonal Domains

In this paper we consider the problem of computing the weak visibility polygon of any query line segment $pq$ (or $WVP(pq)$) inside a given polygon $P$. Our first non-trivial algorithm runs in simple polygons and needs $O(n^3 \log n)$ time and $O(n^3)$ space in the preprocessing phase to report $WVP(pq)$ of any query line segment $pq$ in time $O(\log n + |WVP(pq)|)$. We also give an algorithm to compute the weak visibility polygon of a query line segment in a non-simple polygon with $h$ pairwise-disjoint polygonal obstacles with a total of $n$ vertices. Our algorithm needs $O(n^2 \log n)$ time and $O(n^2)$ space in the preprocessing phase and computes $WVP(pq)$ in query time of $O(n\hbar \log n + k)$, in which $\hbar$ is an output sensitive parameter of at most $\min(h,k)$, and $k = O(n^2h^2)$ is the output size. This is the best query-time result on this problem so far.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.