Paper detail

Weak percolation on multiplex networks with overlapping edges

We solve the weak percolation problem for multiplex networks with overlapping edges. In weak percolation, a vertex belongs to a connected component if at least one of its neighbors in each of the layers is in this component. This is a weaker condition than for a mutually connected component in interdependent networks, in which any two vertices must be connected by a path within each of the layers. The effect of the overlaps on weak percolation turns out to be opposite to that on the giant mutually connected component. While for the giant mutually connected component, overlaps do not change the critical phenomena, our theory shows that in two layers any (nonzero) concentration of overlaps drives the weak percolation transition to the ordinary percolation universality class. In three layers, the phase diagram of the problem contains two lines -- of a continuous phase transition and of a discontinuous one -- connected in various ways depending on how the layers overlap. In the case of only doubled overlapped edges, two of the end points of these lines coincide, resulting in a tricritical point like that seen in heterogeneous $k$-core percolation.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.