Paper detail

Weak lensing statistics from the Coyote Universe

Analyzing future weak lensing data sets from KIDS, DES, LSST, Euclid, WFIRST requires precise predictions for the weak lensing measures. In this paper we present a weak lensing prediction code based on the Coyote Universe emulator. The Coyote Universe emulator predicts the (non-linear) power spectrum of density fluctuations (P_delta) to high accuracy for k \in [0.002;3.4] h/Mpc within the redshift interval z \in [0;1], outside this regime we extend P_delta using a modified Halofit code. This pipeline is used to calculate various second-order cosmic shear statistics, e.g., shear power spectrum, shear-shear correlation function, ring statistics and COSEBIs (Complete Orthogonal Set of EB-mode Integrals), and we examine how the upper limit in k (and z) to which P_delta is known, impacts on these statistics. For example, we find that k_max~8 h/Mpc causes a bias in the shear power spectrum at l~4000 that is comparable to the statistical errors (intrinsic shape-noise and cosmic variance) of a DES-like survey, whereas for LSST-like errors k_max~15 h/Mpc is needed to limit the bias at l~4000. For the most recently developed second-order shear statistics, the COSEBIs, we find that 9 modes can be calculated accurately knowing P_delta to k_max=10 h/Mpc. The COSEBIs allow for an EB-mode decomposition using a shear-shear correlation function measured over a finite range, thereby avoiding any EB-mode mixing due to finite survey size. We perform a detailed study in a 5-dimensional parameter space in order to examine whether all cosmological information is captured by these 9 modes with the result that already 7-8 modes are sufficient.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.