Paper detail

Weak Lensing Results from the 75 Square Degree CTIO Survey

We measure seeing-corrected ellipticities for 2 x 10^6 galaxies with magnitude R<23 in 12 widely separated fields totalling 75 deg^2 of sky. At angular scales >30\arcmin, ellipticity correlations are detected at high significance and exhibit nearly the pure &#34;E-mode&#34; behavior expected of weak gravitational lensing. Even when smoothed to the full field size of 2.5 degrees, which is ~25h^-1 Mpc at the lens distances, an rms shear variance of <γ^2>^1/2 = 0.0012 +- 0.0003 is detected. At smaller angular scales there is significant &#34;B-mode&#34; power, an indication of residual uncorrected PSF distortions. The >30\arcmin data constrain the power spectrum of matter fluctuations on comoving scales of ~10h^-1 Mpc to have σ_8 (Ω_m/0.3)^{0.57} = 0.71^{+0.12}_{-0.16} (95% CL, \LambdaCDM, Γ=0.21), where the systematic error includes statistical and calibration uncertainties, cosmic variance, and a conservative estimate of systematic contamination based upon the detected B-mode signal. This normalization of the power spectrum is lower than previous weak-lensing results but generally consistent them, is at the lower end of the σ_8 range from various analyses of galaxy cluster abundances, and agrees with recent determinations from CMB and galaxy clustering. The large and dispersed sky coverage of our survey reduces random errors and cosmic variance, while the relatively shallow depth allows us to use existing redshift-survey data to reduce systematic uncertainties in the N(z) distribution to insignificance. Reanalysis of the data with more sophisticated algorithms will hopefully reduce the systematic (B-mode) contamination, and allow more precise, multidimensional constraint of cosmological parameters.

preprint2002arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.