Paper detail

Weak lensing magnification of Type Ia Supernovae from the Pantheon sample

Using data from the Pantheon SN Ia compilation and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), we propose an estimator for weak lensing convergence incorporating positional and photometric data of foreground galaxies. The correlation between this and the Hubble diagram residuals of the supernovae has $3.6σ$ significance, and is consistent with weak lensing magnification due to dark matter halos centered on galaxies. We additionally constrain the properties of the galactic haloes, such as the mass-to-light ratio $Γ$ and radial profile of the halo matter density $ρ(r)$. We derive a new relationship for the additional r.m.s. scatter in magnitudes caused by lensing, finding $σ_{\rm lens} = (0.06 \pm 0.017) (d_{\rm C}(z)/ d_{\rm C}(z=1))^{3/2}$ where $d_{\rm C}(z)$ is the comoving distance to redshift $z$. Hence the scatter in apparent magnitudes due lensing will be of the same size as the intrinsic scatter of SN Ia by $z \sim 1.2$. We propose a modification of the distance modulus estimator for SN Ia to incorporate lensing, which can be easily calculated from observational data. We anticipate this will improve the accuracy of cosmological parameter estimation for high-redshift SN Ia data.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.