Paper detail

Weak Gravity Conjecture, Central Charges and $η/s$

We correlate the weak gravity conjecture (WGC), the KSS conjecture with chemical potential at extremality and the central charges by going through a particular example in five dimensional AdS spacetime with two unknown coefficients $c_1, c_2$, assuming WGC exists in AdS spacetime. The result that follows from this example suggests that WGC makes the KSS conjecture to hold in the extremal limit but only when one of the coefficient vanishes ($c_1=0, c_2\neq 0$ or $c_2=0, c_1\neq 0$) and when both the coefficients are non zero it can respect and/or violate the KSS conjecture depending on the choice to $c_1$ at extremality, even though $η/s$ do not depend on $c_1$ at extremality. Moreover, WGC is not fully compatible with the calculation of central charges even though the bounds on coefficient $c_1$ that follows from demanding WGC stays within the bounds that central charges predict. As usual, the KSS conjecture is violated, of course, in the non-extremal limit.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.