Paper detail

Weak error analysis of numerical methods for stochastic models of population processes

The simplest, and most common, stochastic model for population processes, including those from biochemistry and cell biology, are continuous time Markov chains. Simulation of such models is often relatively straightforward as there are easily implementable methods for the generation of exact sample paths. However, when using ensemble averages to approximate expected values, the computational complexity can become prohibitive as the number of computations per path scales linearly with the number of jumps of the process. When such methods become computationally intractable, approximate methods, which introduce a bias, can become advantageous. In this paper, we provide a general framework for understanding the weak error, or bias, induced by different numerical approximation techniques in the current setting. The analysis takes into account both the natural scalings within a given system and the step-size of the numerical method. Examples are provided to demonstrate the main analytical results as well as the reduction in computational complexity achieved by the approximate methods.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.