Paper detail

Weak Equivalents for Nonlinear Filtering Functions

The application of a nonlinear filtering function to a Linear Feedback Shift Register (LFSR) is a general technique for designing pseudorandom sequence generators with cryptographic application. In this paper, we investigate the equivalence between different nonlinear filtering functions applied to distinct LFSRs. It is a well known fact that given a binary sequence generated from a pair (nonlinear filtering function, LFSR), the same sequence can be generated from any other LFSR of the same length by using another filtering function. However, until now no solution has been found for the problem of computing such an equivalent. This paper analyzes the specific case in which the reciprocal LFSR of a given register is used to generate an equivalent of the original nonlinear filtering function. The main advantage of the contribution is that weaker equivalents can be computed for any nonlinear filter, in the sense that such equivalents could be used to cryptanalyze apparently secure generators. Consequently, to evaluate the cryptographic resistance of a sequence generator, the weakest equivalent cipher should be determined and not only a particular instance.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.