Paper detail

Weak equivalence and non-classifiability of measure preserving actions

Abért-Weiss have shown that the Bernoulli shift s of a countably infinite group Γis weakly contained in any free measure preserving action (mpa) b of Γ. We establish a strong version of this result, conjectured by Ioana, by showing that s \times b is weakly equivalent to b. This is generalized to non-free mpa's using random Bernoulli shifts. The result for free mpa's is used to show that isomorphism on the weak equivalence class of a free mpa does not admit classification by countable structures. This provides a negative answer to a question of Abért and Elek. We also answer a question of Kechris regarding two ergodic theoretic properties of residually finite groups. An infinite residually finite group Γis said to have EMD if the action p of Γon its profinite completion weakly contains all ergodic mpa's of Γ, and Γis said to have property MD if i \times p weakly contains all mpa's of Γ, where i denotes the trivial action on a standard non-atomic probability space. Kechris asks if these two properties equivalent and we provide a positive answer by studying the relationship between convexity and weak containment.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.