Paper detail

Weak and strong lensing analysis of the triaxial matter distribution of A1689

Halos formed in the standard Lambda cold dark matter framework should follow an universal mass density profile and fit a well defined mass-concentration relation. Lensing analyses of clusters with a large Einstein radius seem to contradict this scenario, with the massive cluster Abell 1689 being often claimed as a notable example of a highly over-concentrated halo. Shape and orientation biases in lensing studies might be at the basis of this disagreement between theory and observations. We developed a method for a full three-dimensional analysis of strong and weak lensing data. Surface density maps estimated from lensing are de-projected to infer the actual triaxial structure of the cluster, whose mass distribution is approximated as an ellipsoidal Navarro-Frenk-White halo with arbitrary orientation. Inversion is performed under competing a priori assumptions, integrated in the method thanks to Bayesian statistics. We applied the method to A1689. Whatever the considered priors on shape and orientation, both weak and strong lensing analyses found the halo to be slightly over-concentrated but still consistent with theoretical predictions. We found some evidence for a mildly triaxial lens (minor to major axis ratio ~ 0.5 +- 0.2) with the major axis orientated along the line of sight. Exploiting priors from N-body simulations, we found mass M_{200} = (1.3 +- 0.4)x 10^{15}M_Sun and concentration c_{200} =10+-3 for the weak lensing analysis of Subaru data, M_{200} = (1.7 +- 0.3)x 10^{15}M_Sun and c_{200} =6.1+-0.9 for the strong lensing analysis of multiple image systems, and M_{200} = (1.3 +- 0.2)\times 10^{15}M_Sun and c_{200} =7.3+-0.8 for the combined weak plus strong analysis.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.