Paper detail

WD+MS Systems as the Progenitors of Type Ia Supernovae with Different Metallicities

The single-degenerate model for the progenitors of type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) is one of the two most popular models, in which a carbon-oxygen white dwarf (CO WD) accretes hydrogen-rich material from its companion, increases its mass to the Chandrasekhar mass limit, and then explodes as a SN Ia. Incorporating the prescription of Hachisu et al. (1999a) for the accretion efficiency into Eggleton's stellar evolution code and assuming that the prescription is valid for \emph{all} metallicities, we carried out a detailed binary evolution study with different metallicities. We show the initial and final parameter space for SNe Ia in a ($\log P-M_{\rm 2}$) plane. The positions of some famous recurrent novae in the ($\log P-M_{\rm 2}$) plane, as well as a supersoft X-ray source (SSS), RX J0513.9-6951 are well explained by our model, and our model can also explain the space velocity and mass of Tycho G, which is now suggested to be the companion star of Tycho's supernova . Our study indicates that the SSS, V Sge, is a potential progenitor of supernovae like SN 2002ic if the delayed dynamical-instability model in Han & Podsiadlowski (2006) is appropriate.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.