Paper detail

WavFT: Acoustic model finetuning with labelled and unlabelled data

Unsupervised and self-supervised learning methods have leveraged unlabelled data to improve the pretrained models. However, these methods need significantly large amount of unlabelled data and the computational cost of training models with such large amount of data can be prohibitively high. We address this issue by using unlabelled data during finetuning, instead of pretraining. We propose acoustic model finetuning (FT) using labelled and unlabelled data. The model is jointly trained to learn representations to classify senones, as well as learn contextual acoustic representations. Our training objective is a combination of cross entropy loss, suitable for classification task, and contrastive loss, suitable to learn acoustic representations. The proposed approach outperforms conventional finetuning with 11.2% and 9.19% word error rate relative (WERR) reduction on Gujarati and Bengali languages respectively.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.