Paper detail

Wavelength Measurements of K Transitions of Oxygen, Neon, and Magnesium with X-ray Absorption Lines

Accurate atomic transition data are important in many astronomical research areas especially in line spectroscopy study. Whereas transition data of He-like and H-like ions (i.e., ions at high-charge states) are accurately calculated, that of K transitions of neutral or low-ionized metal elements are still very uncertain. Spectroscopy of absorption lines produced in the interstellar medium (ISM) has been proven to be an effective way to measure the central wavelengths of these atomic transitions. In this work we analyze 36 Chandra High Energy Transmission Grating observations and search for and measure the ISM absorption lines along sight lines of 11 low-mass X-ray binaries. We correct the Galactic rotation velocity to the rest frame for every observation and then use two different methods to merge all the corrected spectra to a co-added spectrum. However the co-added spectra obtained by these methods exhibit biases, either to the observations of high counts or high signal-to-noise ratios of the lines. We make Bayesian analysis to several significantly detected lines to obtain the systematic uncertainty and the bias correction of other lines. Compared to previous studies (e.g., Yao et al. 2009), our results improve the accuracy of wavelengths by a factor from two to five and significantly reduce the systematic uncertainties and biases. Several weak transitions (e.g., 1s--2p of Mg IV and Mg V; 1s--3p of Mg III and Mg V) are also detected for the first time, albeit with low significance; future observations with improved accuracy are required to confirm these detections.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.