Paper detail

Wavelength attack scheme on continuous-variable quantum key distribution system using heterodyne detection protocol

The security proof of continuous variable quantum key distribution(CV QKD) based on two assumptions that the eavesdropper can neither act on the local oscillator nor control Bob's beam splitter. These assumptions maybe invalid in practice due to some potential imperfections of the implementations of the protocol. In [Phys.Rev.A, 84.062308], we found that one can control the intensity transmission of the beam splitter by switching the wavelength of the input light. In this paper, we revisit the problem of transmitting the local oscillator in public channel, and propose a wavelength attack targeting the CV QKD systems using heterodyne protocol. Our attack is proved to be feasible and renders all final key shared between the legitimate parties insecure even they have monitored the intensity. To prevent our attack, a wavelength filter should be added before performing the heterodyne detection.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.