Paper detail

Watson-Crick Quantum Finite Automata

1-way quantum finite automata are deterministic and reversible in nature, which greatly reduces its accepting property. In fact the set of languages accepted by 1-way quantum finite automata is a proper subset of regular languages. In this paper we replace the tape head of 1-way quantum finite automata with DNA double strand and name the model Watson-Crick quantum finite automata. The non-injective complementarity relation of Watson-Crick automata introduces non-determinism in the quantum model. We show that this introduction of non-determinism increases the computational power of 1-way Quantum finite automata significantly. We establish that Watson-Crick quantum finite automata can accept all regular languages and that it also accepts some languages not accepted by any multihead deterministic finite automata. Exploiting the superposition property of quantum finite automata we show that Watson-Crick quantum finite automata accept the language L=ww where w belongs to {a,b}*.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.