Paper detail

WaterRPG: A Graph-based Dynamic Watermarking Model for Software Protection

Software watermarking involves embedding a unique identifier or, equivalently, a watermark value within a software to prove owner's authenticity and thus to prevent or discourage copyright infringement. Towards the embedding process, several graph theoretic watermarking algorithmic techniques encode the watermark values as graph structures and embed them in application programs. Recently, we presented an efficient codec system for encoding a watermark number $w$ as a reducible permutation graph $F[π^*]$ through the use of self-inverting permutations $π^*$. In this paper, we propose a dynamic watermarking model, which we call WaterRPG, for embedding the watermark graph $F[π^*]$ into an application program $P$. The main idea behind the proposed watermarking model is a systematic use of appropriate calls of specific functions of the program $P$. More precisely, for a specific input $I_{key}$ of the program $P$, our model takes the dynamic call-graph $G(P, I_{key})$ of $P$ and the watermark graph $F[π^*]$, and produces the watermarked program $P^*$ having the following key property: its dynamic call-graph $G(P^*, I_{key})$ is isomorphic to the watermark graph $F[π^*]$. Within this idea the program $P^*$ is produced by only altering appropriate calls of specific functions of the input application program $P$. We have implemented our watermarking model WaterRPG in real application programs and evaluated its functionality under various and broadly used watermarking assessment criteria. The evaluation results show that our model efficiently watermarks Java application programs with respect to several watermarking metrics like data-rate, bytecode instructions overhead, resiliency, time and space efficiency. Moreover, the embedded watermarks withstand several software obfuscation and optimization attacks.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.