Paper detail

Waterfalls around protostars: Infall motions towards Class 0/I envelopes as probed by water

Abridged abstract: For stars to form, material must fall inwards from core scales through the envelope towards the central protostar. The velocity profile around protostars is poorly constrained. 6 Class 0 protostars and one Class I protostars observed with HIFI on board Herschel as part of the "Water in star-forming regions with Herschel" (WISH) survey show infall signatures in water line observations. We use 1-D non-LTE RATRAN radiative transfer models of the observed water lines to constrain the infall velocity and chemistry in the protostellar envelopes of these sources. We assume a free-fall velocity profile and, having found the best fit, vary the radii over which infall takes place. In the well-studied Class 0 protostar NGC1333-IRAS4A we find that infall takes place over the whole envelope to which our observations are sensitive (r>~1000 AU). For 4 sources infall takes place on core to envelope scales (i.e. ~10000-3000 AU). In 2 sources the inverse P-Cygni profiles seen in the ground-state lines are more likely due to larger-scale motions or foreground clouds. Models including a simple consideration of the chemistry are consistent with the observations, while using step abundance profiles are not. The non-detection of excited water in the inner envelope in 6/7 protostars is further evidence that water must be heavily depleted from the gas-phase at these radii. Infall in four of the sources is supersonic and infall in all sources must take place at the outer edge of the envelope, which may be evidence that collapse is global or outside-in rather than inside-out. The mass infall rate in IRAS4A is large (>~10^-4 msol\yr), higher than the mass outflow rate and expected mass accretion rates onto the star, suggesting that any flattened disk-like structure on small scales will be gravitationally unstable, potentially leading to rotational fragmentation and/or episodic accretion.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.