Paper detail

Water maser emission in planetary nebulae

Planetary Nebulae (PNe) evolve from Asymptotic Giant Branch (AGB) stars after a brief post-AGB phase. Water maser emission is characteristic of oxygen-rich AGB stars, is observed in post-AGB stars and, unexpectedly, has been detected in three PNe (IRAS17347-3139, IRAS18061-2505 and IRAS19255+2123) where the physical conditions to generate water maser emission did not seem to exist. These three objects may be considered as the youngest PNe known up to date and, therefore, they are key objects to understand the formation of PNe. In addition, the existence of water maser PNe allow us to study every phase in the AGB to PN transition using water maser emission which can be observed at very high spatial and spectral resolution. In this paper we review the properties of water maser emission in PNe, the existing observations of the three water maser emitting PNe and their implications in our understanding of PN formation and evolution.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.