Paper detail

Water Goes Where? A Water Resource Allocation Method Based on Multi-Objective Decision-Making

For a long time, water and hydroelectric power are relatively important resources. Their rational distribution is closely related to regional agriculture, industry, residents, etc. In this paper, we mainly study the problem of allocation scheme for Glen Canyon Dam and Hoover Dam in the Colorado River Basin. Taking into consideration of various factors, we build models to achieve optimal scheduling. Firstly, we propose the Water Strategy Decision Model, which can obtain different distribution methods for the different water levels. Also, we connect the two dams in series to consider the coupling effect between them and integrate this part into the main model. Secondly, we propose three criteria of allocation for water and power generation, namely, economic, social, and environmental benefits. Social benefits mainly include the minimum shortage of water and electricity for agriculture, industry, and residents. For this multi-objective plan, the model is solved using a multi-objective ant colony genetic algorithm under the constraint of constant total water volume, and finally, the current reservoir capacities of the two lakes are input to derive the annual water supply to the five states. Thirdly, based on the location and development characteristics of the five states, we obtain a water scheduling model based on the priority of geographic-industry characteristics. Fourthly, we can regard the model as a four-dimensional space of industrial, agricultural, residential and power generation water demand. The partial derivative calculation formula of multi-dimensional space can be used to obtain the results. Finally, we analyze the sensitivity of the model, and it shows that the model has strong adaptability and is easier to popularize. Moreover, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the models.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.