Paper detail

WASP-64b and WASP-72b: two new transiting highly irradiated giant planets

We report the discovery by the WASP transit survey of two new highly irradiated giant planets transiting moderately bright stars. WASP-64b is slightly more massive (1.271+-0.068 M_Jup) and larger (1.271+-0.039 R_Jup) than Jupiter, and is in very-short (a=0.02648+-0.00024 AU, P=1.5732918+-0.0000015 days) circular orbit around a V=12.3 G7-type dwarf (1.004+-0.028 M_Sun, 1.058+-0.025 R_Sun, Teff=5500+-150 K). Its size is typical of hot Jupiters with similar masses. WASP-72b has also a mass a bit higher than Jupiter's (1.461-0.056+0.059 M_Jup) and orbits very close (0.03708+-0.00050 AU, P=2.2167421+-0.0000081 days) to a bright (V=9.6) and moderately evolved F7-type star (1.386+-0.055 M_Sun, 1.98+-0.24 R_Sun, Teff=6250+-100 K). Despite its extreme irradiation (about 5.5 10^9 erg/s/cm^2), WASP-72b has a moderate size (1.27+-0.20 R_Jup) that could suggest a significant enrichment in heavy elements. Nevertheless, the errors on its physical parameters are still too high to draw any strong inference on its internal structure or its possible peculiarity.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access20 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.