Paper detail

Was reionization complete by z ~ 5-6?

It is generally taken for granted that reionization has completed by z=6, due to the detection of flux in the Lyman alpha forest at redshifts z<6. However, since reionization is expected to be highly inhomogeneous, much of the spectra pass through just the ionized component of the intergalactic medium (IGM) even for non-negligible values of the volume-weighted mean neutral hydrogen fraction, x_HI. We study the expected signature of an incomplete reionization at z ~ 5--6, using very large-scale (2 Gpc) seminumeric simulations. We find that ruling out an incomplete reionization is difficult at these redshifts since: (1) quasars reside in biased regions of the ionization field, with fewer surrounding HI patches than implied by the global mean, x_H; (2) absorption from the residual neutral hydrogen inside the ionized IGM generally dominates over the absorption from the remaining HI regions; (3) modeling the Lyman alpha forest and its redshift evolution even in just the ionized IGM is very difficult, and nearly impossible to do a priori. We propose using the fraction of pixels which are dark as a simple, nearly model-independent upper limit on x_HI. Alternately, the size distribution of regions with no detectable flux (dark gaps) can be used to place a more model dependent constraint. Either way, the current sample of quasars is statistically insufficient to constrain x_HI at z~6 to even the 10 per cent level. At z~5, where there are more available sightlines and the forest is less dark, constraining x_HI < 0.1 might be possible given a large dynamic range from very deep spectra and/or the Lyman beta forest. We conclude with the caution against over-interpreting the observations. There is currently no direct evidence that reionization was complete by z ~ 5-6.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.