Paper detail

Warped Disk Galaxies. I. Linking U type Warps in Groups/Clusters to Jellyfish Galaxies

arped disk galaxies are classified into two morphologies: S- and U-types. Conventional theories routinely attribute both types to galactic tidal interaction and/or gas accretion, but reproducing of U-types in simulations is extremely challenging. Here we investigate whether both types are governed by the same mechanisms using the most extensive sample of $\sim$8000 nearby (0.02\,$<$\,z\,$<$\,0.06) massive ($M_{*}/M_{\odot}$\,$>$\,$10^9$) edge-on disks from SDSS. We find that U-types show on average bluer optical colors and higher specific star formation rate (sSFR) than S-types, with more strongly warped U-types having higher sSFR. We also find that while the S-type warp properties correlate with the tidal force by the nearest neighbor regardless of the environment, there is no such correlation for U-types in groups/clusters, suggesting a non-tidal environmental could be at play for U-types, such as ram pressure stripping (RPS). Indeed, U-types are more common in groups/clusters than in fields and they have stellar mass, gas fraction, sSFR enhancement and phase-space distribution closely analogous to RPS-induced jellyfish galaxies in clusters. We furthermore show that the stellar disks of most RPS galaxies in the IllustirsTNG simulation are warped in U-shape and bent in opposite direction of stripped gas tails, satisfying theoretical expectations for stellar warps embeded in jellyfishes. We therefore suggest that despite the majority of U-types that live in fields being still less explained, RPS can be an alternative origin for those in groups/clusters.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.