Paper detail

WARP-Q: Quality Prediction For Generative Neural Speech Codecs

Good speech quality has been achieved using waveform matching and parametric reconstruction coders. Recently developed very low bit rate generative codecs can reconstruct high quality wideband speech with bit streams less than 3 kb/s. These codecs use a DNN with parametric input to synthesise high quality speech outputs. Existing objective speech quality models (e.g., POLQA, ViSQOL) do not accurately predict the quality of coded speech from these generative models underestimating quality due to signal differences not highlighted in subjective listening tests. We present WARP-Q, a full-reference objective speech quality metric that uses dynamic time warping cost for MFCC speech representations. It is robust to small perceptual signal changes. Evaluation using waveform matching, parametric and generative neural vocoder based codecs as well as channel and environmental noise shows that WARP-Q has better correlation and codec quality ranking for novel codecs compared to traditional metrics in addition to versatility for general quality assessment scenarios.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.