Paper detail

Walsh Figure of Merit for Digital Nets: An Easy Measure for Higher Order Convergent QMC

Fix an integer $s$. Let $f:[0,1)^s \to \mathbb R$ be an integrable function. Let $P\subset [0,1]^s$ be a finite point set. Quasi-Monte Carlo integration of $f$ by $P$ is the average value of $f$ over $P$ that approximates the integration of $f$ over the $s$-dimensional cube. Koksma-Hlawka inequality tells that, by a smart choice of $P$, one may expect that the error decreases roughly $O(N^{-1}(\log N)^s)$. For any $α\geq 1$, J.\ Dick gave a construction of point sets such that for $α$-smooth $f$, convergence rate $O(N^{-α}(\log N)^{sα})$ is assured. As a coarse version of his theory, M-Saito-Matoba introduced Walsh figure of Merit (WAFOM), which gives the convergence rate $O(N^{-C\log N/s})$. WAFOM is efficiently computable. By a brute-force search of low WAFOM point sets, we observe a convergence rate of order $N^{-α}$ with $α>1$, for several test integrands for $s=4$ and $8$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.