Paper detail

Wall-modeled large-eddy simulation of non-equilibrium turbulent boundary layers

We conducted WMLES to examine the performance of a simple and widely used ODE-based equilibrium wall model in a spatially-developing 3D TBL inside a bent square duct (Schwarz and Bradshaw 1994) and 3D separated flows behind a skewed bump (Ching et al. 2018a,b; Ching and Eaton 2019). From the square duct simulation, the mean velocity profiles and crossflow angles in the outer region were predicted with high accuracy for all the considered mesh resolutions. Some disagreement was observed in the crossflow angles in the bend region where the non-equilibrium effect is most significant. Also, the simulation for the wall-mounted skewed bump showed that this simple ODE-based equilibrium wall model along with an adequate grid resolution around the 3D separation point resulted in reasonable predictions of 3D separating and reattaching flows, including mean velocity distributions, separation bubbles, and vortex structures in the bump wake.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.