Paper detail

Wall-bounded turbulence control: statistical characterisation of actions/states

The present paper reports the results of a Monte Carlo experiment using a turbulent channel flow. Different actions are proposed, varying the size, duration and sign of a localised volumetric force that acts near one wall of a turbulent channel flow, running at a small Reynolds ($Re_τ=165$) in a small computational domain. The effect of each action is evaluated comparing the evolution of the flow with and without the action, gathering statistics over 1700 repetitions of the experiment for each action. The analysis of the results show that small/short forcings are equally likely to increase or decrease the skin friction drag, independently of the sign of the forcing (i.e., towards or away from the wall). When the size or the duration of the forcing increases, so does the probability of increasing the skin friction. Then, an "a priori" analysis is performed, evaluating the state of the flow just before the action, conditioned to actions that result in a decrease of the skin friction over a period of one eddy turn-over time. The resulting fields of velocity, wall shear stresses and wall pressure are consistent with an opposition control strategy, where the forcing is opposing the vertical motions near the wall. Finally, a preliminary analysis of the performance of actuation triggered by pressure or wall shear stresses sensors is evaluated (i.e., "a posteriori" analysis). Our results show that the actuation triggered by a wall shear sensor seems to be more effective than the actuation triggered by a wall pressure sensor, at least for the preliminary definitions of sensors and thresholds used here.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.