Paper detail

Waiting for Unruh

How long does a uniformly accelerated observer need to interact with a quantum field in order to record thermality in the Unruh temperature? We address this question for a pointlike Unruh-DeWitt detector, coupled linearly to a real Klein-Gordon field of mass $m\ge0$ and treated within first order perturbation theory, in the limit of large detector energy gap $E_{\text{gap}}$. We first show that when the interaction duration $ΔT$ is fixed, thermality in the sense of detailed balance cannot hold as $E_{\text{gap}}\to\infty$, and this property generalises from the Unruh effect to any Kubo-Martin-Schwinger state satisfying certain technical conditions. We then specialise to a massless field in four spacetime dimensions and show that detailed balance does hold when $ΔT$ grows as a power-law in $E_{\text{gap}}$ as $E_{\text{gap}}\to\infty$, provided the switch-on and switch-off intervals are stretched proportionally to $ΔT$ and the switching function has sufficiently strong Fourier decay. By contrast, if $ΔT$ grows by stretching a plateau in which the interaction remains at constant strength but keeping the duration of the switch-on and switch-off intervals fixed, detailed balance at $E_{\text{gap}}\to\infty$ requires $ΔT$ to grow faster than any polynomial in $E_{\text{gap}}$, under mild technical conditions. These results also hold for a static detector in a Minkowski heat bath. The results limit the utility of the large $E_{\text{gap}}$ regime as a probe of thermality in time-dependent versions of the Hawking and Unruh effects, such as an observer falling into a radiating black hole. They may also have implications on the design of prospective experimental tests of the Unruh effect.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.