Paper detail

Waiter-Client Clique-Factor Game

Fix two integers $n, k$, with $n$ divisible by $k$, and consider the following game played by two players, Waiter and Client, on the edges of $K_n$. Starting with all the edges marked as unclaimed, in each round, Waiter picks two yet unclaimed edges. Client then chooses one of these edges to be added to Client's graph, while the other edge is added to Waiter's graph. Waiter wins if she eventually forces Client to create a $K_k$-factor in Client's graph. If she does not manage to do that, Client wins. For fixed $k$ and large enough $n$, it can be easily shown that Waiter wins if she plays optimally (in particular, this is an immediate consequence of our result that for such $n$, Waiter can win quite fast). The question posed by Clemens et al. is how long the game will last if Waiter aims to win as fast as she can, Client tries to delay her as much as he can, and they both play optimally. We denote this optimal number of rounds by $τ_{WC}(\mathcal{F}_{n,K_k-\text{fac}},1 ) $. In the present paper, we obtain the first non-trivial lower bound on this quantity for large $k$. Together with a simple upper bound following the strategy of Clemens et al., this gives $2^{k/3-o(k)}n \leq τ_{WC}(\mathcal{F}_{n,K_k-\text{fac}},1 ) \leq 2^k\frac{n}{k}+C(k)$, where $C(k)$ is a constant dependent only on $k$ and the $o(k)$ term is independent of $n$ as well.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.