Paper detail

Wahlquist's metric versus an approximate solution with the same equation of state

We compare an approximation of the singularity-free Wahlquist exact solution with a stationary and axisymmetric metric for a rigidly rotating perfect fluid with the equation of state $μ+ 3p= μ_0$, a sub-case of a global approximate metric obtained recently by some of us. We see that to have a fluid with vanishing twist vector everywhere in Wahlquist's metric the only option is to let its parameter $r_0\rightarrow0$ and using this in the comparison allows us in particular to determine the approximate relation between the angular velocity of the fluid in a set of harmonic coordinates and $r_0$. Through some coordinate changes we manage to make every component of both approximate metrics equal. In this situation, the free constants of our metric take values that happen to be those needed for it to be of Petrov type D, the last condition that this fluid must verify to give rise to the Wahlquist solution.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.