Paper detail

Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Testing on IP cameras

IP cameras have always been part of the Internet of Things (IoT) and are among the most widely used devices in both home and professional environments. Unfortunately, the vulnerabilities of IP cameras have attracted malicious activities. For example, in 2016, a massive attack resulted in thousands of cameras and IoT devices being breached and used to create a botnet. Given this history and the extremely sensitive nature of the data these devices have access to, it is natural to question what security measures are in place today. In this paper, a vulnerability assessment and penetration testing is performed on a specific model of IP camera, the TP-Link Tapo C200. More in detail, our findings show that the IP camera in question suffers from three vulnerabilities such as: denial of service, video eavesdropping and, finally, a new type of attack called "Motion Oracle". Experiments are not limited to the offensive part but also propose countermeasures for the camera in question and for all those that may suffer from the same vulnerabilities. The countermeasure is based on the use of another IoT device, a Raspberry Pi.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.